<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikibody.org AKA Mapping the human body for academic purpose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.QuebecValley.com/2008/04/11/wikibodyorg-aka-mapping-the-human-body-for-academic-purpose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.QuebecValley.com/2008/04/11/wikibodyorg-aka-mapping-the-human-body-for-academic-purpose/</link>
	<description>The Internet Startup Valley in Quebec</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:41:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.QuebecValley.com/2008/04/11/wikibodyorg-aka-mapping-the-human-body-for-academic-purpose/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.QuebecValley.com/2008/04/11/wikibodyorg-aka-mapping-the-human-body-for-academic-purpose/#comment-868</guid>
		<description>@Robin

You have a good point and I must mention that I am not an expert in licensing. Sylvain Carle pointed me in the right direction some time ago regarding my own blog. What I wanted to prevent with the Share Alike is people reselling the material with a different license. 

I don’t really care if they resell it actually, but if they resell it with a different license then this would bother not only me but all the contributors. Since I want this project to be as open as possible, I’m open to comments and I appreciate your help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robin</p>
<p>You have a good point and I must mention that I am not an expert in licensing. Sylvain Carle pointed me in the right direction some time ago regarding my own blog. What I wanted to prevent with the Share Alike is people reselling the material with a different license. </p>
<p>I don’t really care if they resell it actually, but if they resell it with a different license then this would bother not only me but all the contributors. Since I want this project to be as open as possible, I’m open to comments and I appreciate your help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.QuebecValley.com/2008/04/11/wikibodyorg-aka-mapping-the-human-body-for-academic-purpose/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.QuebecValley.com/2008/04/11/wikibodyorg-aka-mapping-the-human-body-for-academic-purpose/#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Salut Denis,

great idea to build a wiki, but I&#039;m wondering about your choice for a licence. The sharealike and non-commercial clauses should never be used together, at least that&#039;s the impression I get. Sharealike means &quot;come on down, build with me&quot; yet &quot;non-commercial&quot; means &quot;but there are these conditions since I don&#039;t want you to screw me&quot;. NC   SA gets messy real fast, having to obtain, for the next 75 years at least, the permission from all contributors to put a price on the collective work. It still isn&#039;t clear what constitutes commercial usage. A blog with ads, printing out copies and charging for the ink and paper?

Well, I hope you can make the content as free as the gfdl or creative commons by   sa allows. And that the project will take off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salut Denis,</p>
<p>great idea to build a wiki, but I&#8217;m wondering about your choice for a licence. The sharealike and non-commercial clauses should never be used together, at least that&#8217;s the impression I get. Sharealike means &#8220;come on down, build with me&#8221; yet &#8220;non-commercial&#8221; means &#8220;but there are these conditions since I don&#8217;t want you to screw me&#8221;. NC   SA gets messy real fast, having to obtain, for the next 75 years at least, the permission from all contributors to put a price on the collective work. It still isn&#8217;t clear what constitutes commercial usage. A blog with ads, printing out copies and charging for the ink and paper?</p>
<p>Well, I hope you can make the content as free as the gfdl or creative commons by   sa allows. And that the project will take off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
