<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Micro financing in Montreal..?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.QuebecValley.com/2007/09/10/micro-financing-in-montreal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.QuebecValley.com/2007/09/10/micro-financing-in-montreal/</link>
	<description>The Internet Startup Valley in Quebec</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:41:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Yoskovitz</title>
		<link>http://www.QuebecValley.com/2007/09/10/micro-financing-in-montreal/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Yoskovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://QuebecValley.com/2007/09/10/micro-financing-in-montreal/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>The challenge for VCs is whether or not they can change their mindset substantially enough to run a lightweight, fast-moving early stage seed fund. The funding strategy and approach (i.e. due diligence, legal, etc.) has to be hugely different than what VCs normally go through.

As for Y Combinator, there may have been some early grumbling about the value they bring, but having seen it first hand, talking to Y Combinator funded companies and seeing the overall success rate, I don&#039;t think anyone would say that anymore. And in fact, we now have copycats like TechStars emerging.

Incubators of the Y Combinator variety can work. Personally I love the model. Whether you can get enough ultra high quality companies on board, along with the right investors, advisers, etc. is another question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The challenge for VCs is whether or not they can change their mindset substantially enough to run a lightweight, fast-moving early stage seed fund. The funding strategy and approach (i.e. due diligence, legal, etc.) has to be hugely different than what VCs normally go through.</p>
<p>As for Y Combinator, there may have been some early grumbling about the value they bring, but having seen it first hand, talking to Y Combinator funded companies and seeing the overall success rate, I don&#8217;t think anyone would say that anymore. And in fact, we now have copycats like TechStars emerging.</p>
<p>Incubators of the Y Combinator variety can work. Personally I love the model. Whether you can get enough ultra high quality companies on board, along with the right investors, advisers, etc. is another question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
